The geo-economics of BRICS+ and its rise in the global economy: a threat or a necessity for the new world order

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71068/SMJ00114

Keywords:

BRICS+, geoeconomics, global governance, Global South, de-dollarization, Angola.

Abstract

Introduction: The expansion of BRICS+ has become a relevant expression of contemporary geoeconomic change because it increases the participation of emerging economies in debates on trade, development finance, settlement currencies and global governance. Objective: This study analyzes how the geoeconomic rise of BRICS+ influences the reconfiguration of the global economic order and the position of the United States, while considering implications for African economies such as Angola. Method: A qualitative, bibliographic, documentary, descriptive and reflective review was conducted using recent academic studies and institutional documents on BRICS enlargement, economic integration, the New Development Bank, de-dollarization, strategic resources and South–South cooperation. Results: The synthesis indicates that enlargement strengthens agenda-setting capacity and institutional diversification, although national interests, productive asymmetries and coordination costs continue to constrain collective action. Evidence supports gradual diversification rather than an immediate replacement of the existing monetary and institutional architecture. Conclusions: BRICS+ should be interpreted as a heterogeneous platform that can pressure and reform global governance while building complementary mechanisms. For Angola, opportunities depend on domestic institutional capacity, project quality, technological learning and productive transformation.

References

1. Babić M, Dixon AD, Liu IT, editors. The political economy of geoeconomics: Europe in a changing world. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan; 2022. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-01968-5

2. Dunford M, Liu W, Pompeani C. Area Development and Policy, the Greater BRICS and a new world order? Area Dev Policy. 2022;7(4):365-379. doi:10.1080/23792949.2022.2128384.

3. Cochrane L, Zaidan E. Shifting global dynamics: an empirical analysis of BRICS+ expansion and its economic, trade, and military implications in the context of the G7. Cogent Soc Sci. 2024;10(1):2333422. doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2333422.

4. Nach M, Ncwadi R. BRICS economic integration: prospects and challenges. S Afr J Int Aff. 2024;31(2):151-166. doi:10.1080/10220461.2024.2380676.

5. de Carvalho G, Anand J, Naidu S. BRICS expansion: adaptive response or proactive restructuring of global governance? S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):9-32. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2523507.

6. Wang PBM, Mishra R. Assessing the impact of an expanded BRICS on the international order: the role of power and legitimacy. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):33-49. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2509571.

7. Alden C, Schoeman M. Being Africa’s BRIC(S): South Africa’s foreign policy turn from ‘Neo-Liberalism’ to the ‘New Era’. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):71-90. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2503212.

8. Pitcher MA, Moorman M. The logic of authoritarian industrial policy: the case of Angola’s special economic zone. Afr Aff (Lond). 2022;121(485):595-622. doi:10.1093/afraf/adac033.

9. Qian J, Vreeland JR, Zhao J. The impact of China’s AIIB on the World Bank. Int Organ. 2023;77(1):217-237. doi:10.1017/S0020818322000327.

10. de Carvalho G, Gruzd S, Wu YS. The BRICS expanded: shaped by – or shaping – the global order? S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):1-8. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2525312.

11. Omoigberale O. The expanded BRICS: a catalyst for global transformation or advocate for incremental change? S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):51-70. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2518522.

12. Konwer S. An expanded BRICS: agenda and stakes for India. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):155-173. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2528237.

13. Esteves P, Coelho CF. Be careful what you wish for: Brazil and BRICS in three acts. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):91-112. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2528980.

14. Hooijmaaijers B. The internal and external institutionalization of the BRICS countries: the case of the New Development Bank. Int Polit Sci Rev. 2022;43(4):481-494. doi:10.1177/01925121211024159.

15. Nanwani S. The New Development Bank: directions on strategic partnerships. Glob Policy. 2024;15(2):434-442. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.13268.

16. de Sá RMR, Garcia AS. Convergences between the BRICS Business Council and the New Development Bank: implications of the BRICS membership expansion. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):267-290. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2529581.

17. Caixeta MB, Pithan BD, Ferreira JPS, Mariano M. O Brics, o Sul Global e a transformação da ordem mundial: O Novo Banco de Desenvolvimento. Mural Internacional. 2024;15:e83564. doi:10.12957/rmi.2024.83564.

18. Johnston LA. The BRICS, the dollar and SWIFT: a review of evolving interests and monetary reform momentum. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):243-266. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2523509.

19. Mpanda MM, Sebola IKN. Dedollarisation in the BRICS+ currency bloc: a market-based analysis of return and volatility connectedness. Eurasian Econ Rev. 2026. doi:10.1007/s40822-026-00372-z.

20. Lissovolik Y. BRICS expansion: new geographies and spheres of cooperation. BRICS J Econ. 2024;5(1):1-12. doi:10.3897/brics-econ.5.e120071.

21. Müller M. Between global geopolitics and national interests: BRICS cooperation in the mineral sector. S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):215-241. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2519981.

22. Govender J. The BRICS in Africa: promoting development? S Afr J Int Aff. 2025;32(1-2):291-293. doi:10.1080/10220461.2025.2495914.

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

José Barbante, D., Santos Silva, S. C. C. dos, & Fragoso Frazão, E. I. D. S. (2026). The geo-economics of BRICS+ and its rise in the global economy: a threat or a necessity for the new world order. Sapiens Management Journal, 3(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.71068/SMJ00114

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.